https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955985
Michel Alexandre Salim <mic...@michel-slm.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |mic...@michel-slm.name
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |mic...@michel-slm.name
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim <mic...@michel-slm.name> ---
Taking this review.
Some initial issues:
Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file MIT-LICENSE is not marked as %license
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
Installation errors
-------------------
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libyajl.so.2()(x86-64) needed by
rubygem-ffi-yajl-2.4.0-1.fc35.x86_64
Is libyajl being reviewed? It should probably be marked as a blocker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
