Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225255

Jan Engelhardt <jeng...@medozas.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jeng...@medozas.de

--- Comment #8 from Jan Engelhardt <jeng...@medozas.de> 2011-01-01 14:15:07 EST 
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > any idea what the difference between this package's source tree
> > and arptables-0.0.3-3 from ebtables.sourceforge.net ? Is this package a
> > fork ? Any pointers to the story behind how we ended up with two different
> > ones would be much appreciated...    
> 
> No idea what should be marked as a fork. These two packages have the same
> basis.

Looks pretty much like arptables_jf is the fork, since it reuses the arptables
name with a _jf suffix, was created by a Redhat employee, and is also only used
by Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to