https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799

Otto Urpelainen <otu...@iki.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |otu...@iki.fi
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(pa...@hubbitus.in
                   |                            |fo)



--- Comment #9 from Otto Urpelainen <otu...@iki.fi> ---
This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I
can review. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or
do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month.

Upstream README starts with note about being unmaintained. Combined with the
build and bundling issues, it seems to me that ulatencyd should not be added to
Fedora. But, it is your call if you want to keep it running, of course.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to