Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666763

--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <ti...@math.uh.edu> 2011-01-03 23:16:45 EST 
---
This ticket has existed for just under a day so far; I'm not sure how fast you
believe the process is but it's a bit early to be anxious about obtaining a
sponsor.

Have you read the documentation Martin provided in comment 1?  Have you done
any package review work?  Looked over any of the 250+ other tickets awaiting
reviews?  We have far fewer sponsors than new contributors and some folks have
been waiting for months.  Helping out with that and demonstrating your
understanding of packaging will help to attract a sponsor.

Personally I'm not interested in reviewing this because if I can't figure out
what the package is supposed to do from reading the %description, I rarely
bother.  Jargon like "APRS" and "Mic-E" might mean something to someone, but
they mean nothing to me.  It's generally considered polite to try to define
acronyms and such in your package description, if for no other reason than it
gives more useful search terms.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to