https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772

Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(fe...@kaechele.ca |
                   |)                           |



--- Comment #14 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org> ---
(In reply to Package Review from comment #13)
> This is an automatic check from review-stats script.
> 
> This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
> that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
> respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
> submitter to proceed with the review.
> 
> If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
> fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
> this ticket.
> 
> Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Yes, I'm still very much interested in that review to be completed (normally,
it should now have become a no-brainer, as the latest iteration cleared the
concerns; see #10).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to