https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983601
--- Comment #7 from Aleksei Bavshin <alebast...@gmail.com> --- > i find myself nowadays more and more tempted with removing both 1.8 and 2.0 > from > Fedora and switching default version to 2.2 but one problem after another. I took a look at the 4 remaining packages in rawhide that are still depending on guile 2.0, and all of them are working with 2.2/3.0 (with minimal build scripts patching when necessary). I can send PRs over the weekend and if maintainers accept these we'll no longer need 2.0. 1.8 requires actual porting, afaik, so I haven't even tried. > I will change it to guile30 since we already named guile 2.2 as 22 and i do > not want to have "." in package name. Current version of packaging policies actually recommends to preserve the "."[1]. But I agree with the argument about naming consistency. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
