Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657403

Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> 2011-01-06 04:07:58 EST 
---
Hi,

(In reply to comment #7)
> http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=elmarco/public_git/spice-gtk.git;a=commitdiff;h=59051f0de1772fadf1fd5ad6661d595585148279;hp=16c5fea8350282425bfe4d36ce4d4c5a9e381304
> 

Looks good now. Note though that it is custom to bump the spec file's release
field and add a changelog entry whenever you make changes, even during the
package review phase.

> The SRPM is actually made from a git snapshot of version 0.3.20, which has a
> broken python module bug.
> 
> I propose we wait until 0.4 release.

Waiting with importing and building till the 0.4 release is fine with me. But
lets move forward with getting you sponsored and creating a git repo and
bugzilla component, etc. for spice-gtk. So that it can get imported and build
as soon as 0.4 is released. If you can give me your fas account name, then I'll
add you to the packagers group and sponsor you. After that you can move forward
with the SCM request:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

Regards,

Hans

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to