Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638647 --- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> 2011-01-07 04:59:01 EST --- Richard, you must be the reviewer if you want to be the sponsor: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored | Review and approval for the first package for new packagers | must be done by registered sponsors. Subsequent reviews can be done | by any package maintainer. Informal reviews can always be done by | anyone interested. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group [...] > %files > ... > %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/* Notice that directory %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} is not included: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories Better replace the line with just: %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ which includes the directory and its contents. The trailing slash is just for readability (to make more clear that the entry is for a directory). Also be aware that explicitly including files in %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} conflicts with using %doc to include documentation files. As it's a common pitfall for packagers, I recommend you add a comment to the %files section that %doc MUST NOT be used to include further documentation files as long as %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} is used. With recent distribution releases there will be an error. With older ones, you would kill files without any error/warning. > Requires: libvirt, libvirt-python Even if it may be obvious to insiders, please add a comment here that explains why these two Explicit Requires are necessary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review