https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997378

Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |msu...@redhat.com



--- Comment #16 from Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> ---
One nitpick:

> %if 0%{?fedora} < 35

This can cause problems when downstreaming. E.g. This becomes true on RH 9 (or
10). Because the macro fedora is not defined there and it becomes 0 < 35 which
is True.
It is better to write it as:

> %if 0%{?fedora} && 0%{?fedora} < 35

or you can reverse the condition

%if 0%{?fedora} < 35
   #nothing to do here because.....
%elif
  Requires:.....
%endif

But this definitely does not block the review.
I explained to Marek the processes in Fedora and how to do the things.
I granted Marek the packager role.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997378
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to