https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> --- Regarding the signed binaries, I understand that they need to be signed by Intel but we need to at least be able to build them (as reproducibly as possible, to verify what was signed). So in parallel to aesm the SGX SDK needs to be packaged in Fedora as well. Fedora cannot use the RPMs at https://download.01.org/intel-sgx/. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
