https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
--- Comment #17 from Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15)
> > What about 'Provides:systemd-boot-signed(%{efi_arch)) = %version-%release' ?
>
> Added:
> +Provides: systemd-boot-signed-%{efi_arch} = %version-%release
> and in the systemd pr:
> +Provides: systemd-boot-unsigned-%{efi_arch} = %version-%release
>
> I guess that using -%{efi_arch} has the advantage that (%{efi_arch}) could
> be mistaken
> and/or interfere with (%{_isa}).
>
Yes, thanks for doing that! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
