https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
--- Comment #26 from Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Jered Floyd from comment #23)
> > > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> > > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
> > > trafficserver-selinux , trafficserver-devel , trafficserver-perl
> >
> > The selinux subpackage is fine as-is, but the rest need their "%{name} =
> > %{version}-%{release}" dependency updated to "%{name}%{?_isa} =
> > %{version}-%{release}".
>
> For trafficserver-perl, would it actually be more correct to add:
>
> BuildArch: noarch
>
> rather than adding the architecture to the dependencies?
Yes. I also just noticed you should probably be using "%{perl_vendorlib}"
instead of "%{_datadir}/perl5" in your file lists.
You need to add BuildRequires for perl-generators and perl-interpreter too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
