https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #3) > Quite intrigued by the use of %files along with the new OCaml macros, > but it does seem to produce the correct mix of files in the subpackages > as far as I can tell. There is a file in -devel called: > > /usr/lib64/ocaml/camlp-streams/opam > > which I guess is opam metadata? Yes. I'm unclear on whether we really need that in Fedora or not. "dune install" installs it; every dune-using package will have one. We should probably figure out whether we really want it or not. Thank you for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
