https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902



--- Comment #5 from Miro HronĨok <mhron...@redhat.com> ---
> Miro has been telling people that adding the license file under %license as 
> well is redundant, so I left it out of this package.

Note that this depends on the build backend. I've been telling people that when
the build backend marks it as License-File, %{pyproject_files} will include it
marked as %license, and adding it again is redundant. This package apparently
uses flit-core build backend and flit-core does not do that.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to