https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113075
Salman <cn...@protonmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cn...@protonmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Salman <cn...@protonmail.com> ---
THIS IS AN UNOFFICIAL REVIEW:
The following will possibly need to be adressed
Issues:
=======
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/skbutt/review/review-
basez/diff.txt
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/
--- /home/skbutt/review/review-basez/upstream-unpacked/Source1/README
2022-08-01 21:32:40.020931501 -0400
+++ /home/skbutt/review/review-basez/srpm-unpacked/README-extract/README
2022-08-01 21:32:40.053931910 -0400
@@ -104,2 +104,3 @@
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license,
or a later version.
Since the README already exists, you may need to Patch this as well. Hence the
diff error.
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Bad spec filename: /home/skbutt/review/review-basez/srpm-
unpacked/basez.spec
See: (this test has no URL)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113075
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
