Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #75 from Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> 2011-01-24 10:48:16 EST --- "Please do not Obsoletes libva-freeworld. This package will still be needed since '3rd repo' rely on the Splitted Desktop version which is binary incompatible with the Freedesktop version." I don't think libva-freeworld is an appropriate package name for a build of the SDS fork. "Note that the vdpau-video package does indeed mandatory requires the SD version." You keep saying that, but I haven't seen any proof; I'm pretty sure I built vdpau-video against upstream libva already...Gwenole himself told me there's almost no point to the SDS fork except Poulsbo, now. "And for the record, as the hardware support range for this package is currently shorter than the SD version, that's unlikely that packages provided by '3rd repo' will link to this version." Honestly, there's a limit to how long we can carry around an obsolete library just to make poulsbo's shitty driver happy, and I say that as the maintainer of poulsbo's shitty driver... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
