https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141070
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember <klem...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4) > I'm very sure that you're misremembering things here. MIT is indeed one of > the licenses where full license text in redistributed sources is required. > Additionally, the Packaging Guidelines only forbid including license texts > that are separate from *upstream*, but including the actual upstream license > text is OK if it's not in the tarball but only in the git repo (as is the > case here). Oh, right you are. I'll fix that and add the license file before importing the package. Thanks a lot (again!) for the review :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141070 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
