Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 --- Comment #14 from Terje Røsten <terje...@phys.ntnu.no> 2011-01-26 08:01:52 EST --- No, don't help. This line Provides: iptraf-ng = %{version} is implicit any way. This line Obsoletes: iptraf <= 3.0.1-10 is correct. This means when iptraf-ng is installed iptraf is removed, I guess you want that to happen Now if some installed package A have a dep on iptraf, rpm/yum will refuse to install iptraf-ng as iptraf is removed with nothing to satisfy the dep package A has on iptraf. So we solve that by adding Provides: iptraf = %{version}-%{release} in iptraf-ng.spec, letting iptraf-ng satisfy the dep pacakge A has on iptraf. However, we have just obsoleted iptraf <= 3.0.1-10, when %{version}-%{release} < 3.0.1-10 the package obsoletes itself, not good. I see two options: - adjust %{version} to be > 3.0.1 or use this line Provides: iptraf = 3.0.1-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
