Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665560

--- Comment #16 from Minnikhanov <minnikha...@gmail.com> 2011-01-27 12:18:56 
EST ---
Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-mail.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-mail-2.2.14-5.fc14.src.rpm

(In reply to comment #14)
> * Could you put the BuildRequires you just added onto separate lines. A style
> things yes, and not a blocker, but still I feel it makes it more legible

+ Fixed. (I saw like that anywhere, nothing else)

> * Why did you add the sections in %prep to "fix anything executable that
> doesn't have a shebang" and "find files with a shebang that don't have
> executable permissions". Looking at the gem there are no executable files nor
> files that should be so I'm not sure what these blocks are trying to 
> accomplish
> 

+ Fixed. Remove these.

> * rpmlint complains about a missing %clean section, could you please add it,
> even if it is empty
> 

- Not need by Comment 15.

> * building the rpm results in an error stating the LICENSE.rdoc file cannot be
> found. Where are you getting this? If no such file exists could you please
> remove it from the %files section
> 

+ Fixed. (sorry)

> * additionally building the rpm outputs that the Gemfile.lock file is not
> listed in %files. Furthermore the Gemfile is listed as a file in the doc
> subpackage, which is incorrect as its needed by the mail runtime. Please put
> both Gemfile and Gemfile.lock in the main package %files section (not marked 
> as
> %doc either)

+ Fixed. 
There is not 'Gemfile.lock' in upstream - create this file by 'touch' in %prep.
Is this right?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to