Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839 --- Comment #4 from William Lima <wl...@primate.com.br> 2011-01-30 18:19:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > William, why should I do this? Why not? He's the maintainer. > Newer versions of boost are (according to some upstream people, I'm not a C/ > C++ guy) API incompatible and I'm pretty sure, Red Hat will not break API > compatibility of boost. Yes, Boost had some interface changes and many of which are not backward compatible. > So the only way, Red Hat might be walk for themself is like they did e.g. for > postgresql (-> postgresql84) or php (-> php53). If such a thing will ever > happen, we still can obsolete this package. Upgrade the existing package to a new version is the better way (instead of creating a new one), and should not affect existing packages. I see no need for this. Just ask him to update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
