https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670
Maxwell G <maxw...@gtmx.me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org |maxw...@gtmx.me
CC| |maxw...@gtmx.me
Status|NEW |POST
Flags| |fedora-review+
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #2 from Maxwell G <maxw...@gtmx.me> ---
This package was generated using rust2rpm, which simplifies the review.
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
- [x] The specfile is sane.
- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is
justified.
- [x] The License tag uses the correct identifiers, and it reflects the package
contents and Cargo metadata.
- [x] The license text is included in the package and is marked with %license.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors. (There are some warnings about zero
length test files.)
- [-] (Justified with a comment in the specfile) The package runs tests in
%check.
- [x] The package complies with the Rust and general Packaging Guidelines.
Package approved. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
