Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmasl...@redhat.com> 2011-01-31 06:37:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Because vendor directory is reserved for third-party packages. We are > > trying to > > allow administrators to overlay Perl modules with their own repositories. > > Upstream perl reference please. > > If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's > perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider > "Fedora" == "vendor". > > Consider all of your packages which are not installing to vendor_dir blocked. It was convention, but in F-13 were paths cut and vendor has the same path as core perl. You didn't disagree with this change, which was similarly fundamental. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
