Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596138 --- Comment #18 from Kai Engert (kaie) <keng...@redhat.com> 2011-01-31 14:42:04 EST --- Jason, thank you very much for your time, I highly appreciate it. (In reply to comment #17) > Indeed, the 0.3.6 version starts in rawhide and seems to function well enough. glad to hear > I note that there's only the MPL license text included. I updated the LICENSE file to include a header, followed by all 3 license texts. Released as 0.3.7 > I assume you want to push this to el5, since it appears to have a sufficiently > new xulrunner. Yes > If not, however, you can remove BuildRoot, %clean and the first > line of %install. I've added reminder comments to the specfile, so this cleanup can be done later, after the RHEL 5 package has been branched. > It is not necessary for you to manually specify a dependency on > boost-program-options; rpm finds that out on its own. Ok, thanks, removed. > This needs a .desktop file. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files Ok. Added an icon and a desktop file. New spec file http://kuix.de/fedora/nss-gui/nss-gui.spec New SRPM http://kuix.de/fedora/nss-gui/nss-gui-0.3.7-1.fc14.src.rpm I believe I have addressed all of your requests. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
