https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759
--- Comment #18 from Jeremy Newton <alexjn...@fastmail.com> --- Ok updated, should be much better now: Spec URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocclr.spec SRPM URL: https://mystro256.fedorapeople.org/rocclr-5.5.1-5.fc39.src.rpm copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mystro256/rocm-hip/build/5995610/ Note that there's a planned koji outage right now, so it'll take me time to update rocm-device-libs with the fixed paths, so I uploaded the fixed package to my copr for testing. Some responses to comments I missed: > +# it would be good if these rocm packages were versioned so > +# we are not mixing 5.5.0 and 5.5.1 I'm not sure which this is referring to. Comgr and device libs is not ROCm versioned because I forked it to be more aligned with LLVM releases. For some background, upstream ROCm builds against unstable LLVM, so I can't really package official ROCm releases with Fedora, rather I've resorted to forking and making my own release branches until ROCm moves it into llvm-project proper, which I believe is on their TODO list. As for rocminfo and rocm-runtime. I don't generally update it beyond .0 unless there's fixes, e.g. no update from 5.5.0 to 5.5.1 because they rarely update it and they retag the same git hash most of the time. It's a lot of package update curn to update packages that don't changes. When I back-port to EPEL, I always rebuild the latest though, since I only update it when a new RHEL is released. I added ">= %{rocm_version}" to the BuildRequires/Requires to reduce mixing. I can add a provides for the rocm_version to these packages if you want stricter requirements. E.g. to rocminfo I can add "Provides: rocminfo(rocm) = %{rocm_release}" and then have these packages depend on that. Current rpmlint output: > hip.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hipcc > hip.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hipcc.pl > hip.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hipconfig > hip.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hipconfig.pl > hip-devel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hipcc_cmake_linker_helper > hip-devel.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hipdemangleatp > rocm-clinfo.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rocm-clinfo > rocm-hip-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary roc-obj > rocm-hip-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary roc-obj-extract > rocm-hip-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary roc-obj-ls > hip-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation > rocm-clinfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation > rocm-hip-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > rocm-opencl.x86_64: W: no-documentation > rocm-opencl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
