https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244402



--- Comment #5 from Sandro <gui...@penguinpee.nl> ---
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #4)
> The prep section should not do more than use commands such as mv, rm, sed
> etc.
> 
> ant ebcdic compiles the java file at:
> https://github.com/roskakori/CodecMapper/tree/master/source/at/roskakori/
> codecmapper
> and then generates the codec files:
> https://github.com/roskakori/CodecMapper/blob/master/build.xml#L43
> 
> It should therefore be in the build section.

Since SHOULD does not mean a mandatory requirement, I feel I'm still within my
liberties to diverge. Could you point me to a relevant section of the packaging
guidelines, so I can read up on it?

> 
> For the url, it is sufficient to have:
> URL:            https://github.com/roskakori/CodecMapper

I chose the somewhat longer URL since that has the `README.rst` displayed and
gives information relevant to `EBCDIC`. But I'm fine with using `%forgeurl`
instead, since the package does need code from `CodecMapper` to be useful.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244402

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202244402%23c5
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to