https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249479
Nils Philippsen <nphil...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nphil...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen <nphil...@redhat.com> ---
Spec URL:
https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-rpmautospec-core/2/python-rpmautospec-core.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/python-rpmautospec-core/2/python-rpmautospec-core-0.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm
This fixes one of the two issues…
(In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #1)
> Two minor issues, see below:
…
> Issues:
> =======
> - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
> in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
> for the package is included in %license.
> Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
> See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
> guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
This is because poetry doesn’t let us mark license files as such in the Python
package metadata, therefore the %pyproject_save_files won’t tag them with
%license. I’ve added a workaround.
> - Specfile is 0600 permissions, should be 0644.
This is a bug in rpmautospec (ironically) which is fixed in the repo but not
yet released (which I wanted to do for a while but always got distracted). The
unprocessed spec file has 0644.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249479
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202249479%23c3
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
