Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727 --- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer <ktdre...@ktdreyer.com> 2011-02-23 01:16:04 EST --- Steve, Thank you for your suggestions. (In reply to comment #1) > though in this case I appreciate it supersedes the normal "use > name of tar ball" which you followed. I'm fine with changing it to pam_afs_session. You are right, I was trying to follow the tarball name convention. Do I need to change the name to use underscores? > 2) > A very recent addition to the "rules" is to add %{?_isa} to the > end of your -devel Buildrequires. e.g. I incorporated your %{?_isa} suggestion in 2.1-2 Updated Spec (2.1-2): http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/pam-afs-session.spec F14 build (2.1-2): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2859436 > Report back here with some links to some reviews you have made. A few days ago I reviewed #678199 . I can do more reviews next week if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
