https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646
--- Comment #30 from Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsult...@outlook.com> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #28) > I still don't think you understand the statement in the policy here (and the > people in the security channel apparently don't, either): > > > New crypto libraries must comply with the crypto policies to enter Fedora > > -> wolfssl does not > > > unless an exception has been granted by Fedora packaging committee > > -> it has not > > > after consulting with Fedora security team. > > -> this has happened > > So at least one step in this process has been skipped. > > I'll ask in the Security channel. Yes, I what you are saying, but in my opinion the documentation is not clear, in the ways previously noted. Once we identify the source of authority, looks like that's Felix, I'll be glad to work work through this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202302646%23c30 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
