https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2400860
Phil Wyett <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review? | |needinfo?(eclipseo@mauchin. | |fr) --- Comment #2 from Phil Wyett <[email protected]> --- Hi, Sorry that nobody has had a chance to look at your submission. I will take a first look. Build local: RPM build warnings: /builddir/build/SPECS/bettercap.spec line 40: autopatch: no matching patches in range File listed twice: /usr/share/licenses/bettercap Build COPR: ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp5xg8ha0v')] checks: 32, packages: 2 bettercap.src: E: summary-too-long The Swiss Army knife for 802.11, BLE, HID, CAN-bus, IPv4 and IPv6 networks reconnaissance and MITM attacks bettercap.x86_64: E: summary-too-long The Swiss Army knife for 802.11, BLE, HID, CAN-bus, IPv4 and IPv6 networks reconnaissance and MITM attacks bettercap.spec: W: specfile-warning warning: /tmp/rpmlint.bettercap-2.41.4-1.fc45.src.rpm.epc56b13/bettercap.spec line 40: autopatch: no matching patches in range bettercap.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bettercap bettercap.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: bettercap-2.41.4-vendor.tar.bz2 bettercap.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/bettercap/vendor/github.com/evilsocket/islazy/LICENSE.md /usr/share/licenses/bettercap/LICENSE.md:/usr/share/licenses/bettercap/vendor/github.com/bettercap/nrf24/LICENSE.md:/usr/share/licenses/bettercap/vendor/github.com/bettercap/recording/LICENSE.md bettercap.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/bettercap/vendor/modules.txt /usr/share/licenses/bettercap/modules.txt 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings, 43 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 2.3 s * I would personally add 'BuildRequires: pkg-config'. Regards Phil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2400860 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202400860%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
