Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697801 --- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> 2011-04-20 08:17:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Updated. no bumped version. > > (In reply to comment #1) > > 4) I think following can be skipped from -doc subpackage as its already > > installed by main package > > %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* > > just concerned that rpmlint complains no doc for -doc. guess it's not a big > deal. There is LICENSE file which should be IMO in both packages. Otherwise there are small discrepancy in opinions if files in -doc subpackage should or should not be marked as doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
