https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338798
--- Comment #11 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #8) > (In reply to david08741 from comment #7) > > [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown > > must be documented in the spec. > > It seems files with copyright by Anaconda are BSD and copyright by donfig > > are under the MIT license? > > If so, please add a comment to the spec > > There is no specific split; see the upstream PR linked in the spec. Could you add a comment saying that all files are dual licensed? > (In reply to david08741 from comment #7) > > [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.14/site- > > packages, /usr/lib/python3.14 > > This is probably because it was compiled against python3.14, and now we have > > 3.15 in rawhide? > > Maybe? We'll see on the next build. > It is flagged again, but it seems fine by me. It depends on python(abi) - which is provided by python3, which should depends on python3-libs, which owns the directory. I do not understand this. So it seems like a bug in fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338798 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202338798%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
