Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 Hedayat Vatankhah <heday...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |heday...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |heday...@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Hedayat Vatankhah <heday...@gmail.com> 2011-04-29 19:20:55 EDT --- Hi! This is my review for your package: MUST Items: ------------ RpmLint Output: % rpmlint csdp-6.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm csdp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US semidefinite -> semi definite, semi-definite, definiteness 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. % rpmlint noarch/csdp-octave-6.1.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. % rpmlint csdp-* csdp.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US semidefinite -> semi definite, semi-definite, definiteness csdp.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libsdp.so.6.1.1 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Built successfully in Koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3036616 Passes other MUST and SHOULD items, including Packaging Guidelines. Some notes before accepting the package: - semidefinite looks like to be an acceptable word, but if semi-definite is a better replacement please replace it - defattr can be removed from the %files sections as recently added to the Packaging Guidelines - Where does Csdp.INDEX file in src.rpm come from? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
