Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319 Martin Gieseking <martin.giesek...@uos.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.giesek...@uos.de --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking <martin.giesek...@uos.de> 2011-05-01 03:10:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Please replace all occurences of the application name in the spec with > %{name}. That's optional and only useful in particular cases where the package name is directly related to another entry in the spec file, e.g. the name of the tarball. Using %{name} in %install or %files is not required because there's no benefit of doing so. If you want to use it there anyway, it should be consistent, though (no mix between %{name} and the plain name string). > Wouldn't it be better to use the "install" command instead of cp, especially > to > keep timestamps? cp -a preserves the timestamps too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
