Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706984 Marek Goldmann <mgold...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Marek Goldmann <mgold...@redhat.com> 2011-05-30 11:38:27 EDT --- [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK, thanks for clarification, specify both licenses then. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : b765c9c25789884cb982e7c8fefc0de0 MD5SUM upstream package: b29f50e3dd5933fb7fe498a38f9fb191 It seems they way you create the package changes the timestamps. Use xz compression method - change the instructions (and update the file in srpm) to: # tar cafJ args4j-2.0.16.tar.xz args4j-2.0.16 [x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be removed prior to building Thanks! [x] Latest version is packaged. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
