Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707819 --- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 18:03:51 EDT --- Working my way down the MUST list: MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. I can't find anywhere where the license type is specified. The license file just says it's ok to use/distribute as long as the license file is included. I didn't find any evidence of a MIT license in the source files either using grep. Perhaps it would be better to use: "Freely redistributable without restriction" per the guidelines[1]? More when I have time... Richard [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#.22Distributable.22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
