Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #34 from Martin Gieseking <martin.giesek...@uos.de> 2011-06-03 10:22:36 EDT --- I agree with Christophe that it shouldn't be a problem to build private static libraries and link them to the binary. As long as they are an exclusive part of the project this should be fine. In order to emphasize flicksoup is an integral part of frogr and not intended to be used in third-party projects, I suggest to unify the source headers and release everything under GPLv3. Having differently licensed files might require some explanation (and an additional COPYING file with the LGPL license text in src/flicksoup ;-)). You can change the license back to LGPLv3 -- or whatever license you prefer -- once flicksoup is ready to become a separate project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
