Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705917 W. Michael Petullo <m...@flyn.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #2 from W. Michael Petullo <m...@flyn.org> 2011-06-08 14:01:50 EDT --- Running rpmlint on SRPM: cmuclmtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pocketsphinx -> pocket sphinx, pocket-sphinx, pocketknives cmuclmtk.src: W: invalid-url Source1: cmuclmtk-man.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The first warning should be fine. I think the second is bacause rpmlint is not aware of the .xz extension, so this should also be fine. Running rpmlint on the binary packages: cmuclmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pocketsphinx -> pocket sphinx, pocket-sphinx, pocketknives cmuclmtk.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcmuclmtk.so.0.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The other question I have is about the license. The RPM specification lists "MIT and BSD." I'd like an expert to review the particular license or point to where the text has already been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
