Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 --- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> 2011-07-11 07:46:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > In this way, people will have to once remove rubygem-rdoc every time they want > to use the original rdoc and it seems unpleasant to me. Unpleasant, but IMO: 1) This is the way how it will work if you build/install your own Ruby, so I think Rubyists are used to it. Even now you loose the original rdoc executable once you install the gem version of RDoc. 2) I don't think there will be high demand in using original RDoc once there is installed the gem version. Are you aware about any specific reason why somebody would like to? 3) With RubyGems, there is always possibility to choose the executed version, e.g. you can call "rdoc _3.6_ --version" if you have installed RDoc 3.8 and 3.6 to use RDoc 3.6, so we can do something similar, i.e. rdoc _system_ or rdoc _1.0.1_ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review