Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674114 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Dziallas <sebast...@when.com> 2011-07-11 17:41:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, if you give me some unresolvable reasons why appjet requires its own > framework you might convince me. But I don't see any reason to not move to > latest rhino even if the patches are unavoidable. Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. So, let me try pitching it this way: Etherpad's Appjet requires both a modified version of yuicompressor (and hence rhino). I'm not comfortable arguing that these patches won't affect anybody else using rhino -- simply because I don't know. I have tried compiling etherpad against upstream versions of rhino and yuicompressor, but it throws errors during the compilation. I feel that it'd be fair to argue that in this case patched compat packages for both rhino and yuicompressor could be doable. Did I convice you? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
