Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 --- Comment #11 from Ulrich Schwickerath <ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch> 2011-07-12 08:21:55 EDT --- Hi, thanks for the additional comments! ad 1/ for the time being it is still needed. For a specific application (OpenNebula) a huge speedup is archived by using this package (in addition to nokogiri). I've contacted the developers, the problem seems to come from dependencies on a third package. So, yes, although this package is old it would be good to have it in Fedora. It'll be needed in EPEL for RHES5 and RHES6 ad 2/ should be ruby, from the README. Fixed. ad 3/ true. Removed it. ad 4/5/6 : I need to keep them as I need to build the package also on RHES5 and RHES6. Getting it for these distributions is the goal of this submission ad 7/ done ad 8/ This is what I'm doing in this spec. The copy in the prep step was requested by Steve. ad 9/ done http://uschwick.web.cern.ch/uschwick/software/rubygem-xmlparser.spec http://uschwick.web.cern.ch/uschwick/software/rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-5.el6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
