Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179 --- Comment #20 from Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> 2011-07-29 02:27:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > for #3, do we still need ruby subpackages from rubygems anymore? What is the > policy on this? We can ditch it if not needed, I certainly don't. It is opposite, the ruby- subpackage requires the rubygem- package. The ruby- subpackage was never mandatory. The idea was to use libraries provided as rubygem without rubygems, but the design was wrong from begin IMO. > For the rest, I will fix accordingly, for the BuildRoot can be dropped, but if > this .spec wants to be shared with EPEL we'll still need it then? Yes, you need BuildRoot for EPEL5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
