Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726245 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr> 2011-07-31 07:55:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > [X] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. > Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2+ > The website of this Perl module says "License: unknown". According > to the packaging guidelines, such modules should get "GPL+ or Artistic". > Why are you using a different license here? The pod of the module contains (at the very end of the file): This package may be used and redistributed under the terms of either the Artistic 2.0 or LGPL 2.1 license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
