Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727030 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.leht...@iki.fi> 2011-08-02 10:31:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Mainly because some people say that the file list should be more detailed. I'm one of them: for instance, I abhor too freeminded use of wildcards such as %{python_sitelib}/* which may up owning stuff that it isn't supposed to. Or, for the current example, one might not detect if the egg-info isn't built (which may happen e.g. on EPEL-5, where one has to do a trick to get it). However, there's no sense in listing every single file that goes in the RPM, if they are placed in a package-specific directory, or obey some sane naming scheme, e.g. %{_bindir}/foo %{_bindir}/foo-* Being too specific can also bite you, as you noticed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
