Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 --- Comment #2 from Ngo Than <t...@redhat.com> 2011-08-04 06:43:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Name: ? shouldn't we name it according ruby package naming scheme ruby-qt [1] it's not in packaging guideline, i think it's better to follow the upstream name scheme > Summary: ok just s/QT4/Qt 4 > License: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ > Group: ok > URL: ok > Sources: ok (md5sum d17198b985f954cedd92ab669623de59) > BuildRoot: ok > Requires/BuildRequires: not ok according to Ruby packaging guideline (no ABI > specified) etc. fixed > Provides/Obsoletes: not ok, non sense to obsolete/provide same package (as it > was in kdebindings subpackage already) we need it for upgrade process. > Description: ok > Devel package: ok (but same prov/obs) > Macros usage: ok, consistent > ldconfig: ok > Other Ruby requirements: ok > Docs: ok > > qtruby.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ fixed > qtruby.src: E: specfile-error sh: ruby: command not found > qtruby.src: E: specfile-error sh: ruby: command not found > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. it's rpmlint bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
