Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730426 Mario Blättermann <mari...@freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mari...@freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <mari...@freenet.de> 2011-08-13 15:16:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > mindless.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address > /usr/share/doc/mindless-1.0.0/COPYING > mindless.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mindless > > I've reported both to the developer, as expected. (It remains to be seen if > he > cares enough about it. This is a rather old program.) For the COPYING file, you should fetch a new one from fsf.org [1] and replace the old one. I assume the upstream developer is gone for a long time, given the age of more than eight years. All the other occurences of the old address in the source files you may leave untouched. [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt If there's no man page available, no problem, it is no blocker for a package. Some initial issues: To make your spec better readable, you should put all macros into brackets {}. The %defattr macro in the file list is obsolete, only for packages for older EPEL versions needed. I assume you don't plan to provide it for EPEL, because you didn't define a BuildRoot and there's no %clean section. Your package ships the FreeSans font, which is already available for Fedora (from the package gnu-free-sans-fonts). No idea what to do here, but in my mind, although we don't have a file collision, a system doesn't need a font twice. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3270948 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review