Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697049

--- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann <mari...@freenet.de> 2011-08-14 14:13:11 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)

> I think the proper way to address issues like that, is to notice upstream
> first, wait for them to fix their license and backport that change into 
> current
> tarball.

I'm often packaging software whose upstream developers have gone for a long
time (e.g. WindowMaker dockapps). Should I leave the license file untouched
anyway?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to