Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652623 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov <lemen...@gmail.com> 2011-09-16 05:42:46 EDT --- Heads up! Upstream just released ver. 1.2.0 with almost all legal issues fixed. The remaining one is the absence of the explicit licensing in the include/bitcask.hrl header file (which is so simple that I believe it could be considered as a derivative work under the same licensing terms as the rest of the project, e.g. ASL 2.0). However just to be sure I've added confirmation letter from one of the upstream's authors (with some unrelated conversation removed): http://peter.fedorapeople.org/bitcask.licensing Here is the latest package: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-bitcask.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-bitcask-1.2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
