Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #34 from Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> 2011-09-29 19:48:24 EDT --- > Do you suggest to modify to .spec file so that to avoid advertising > them as provided? For the versioned libraries that would be better. Not mandatory however with our current guidelines. Primarly I want you to be aware of this. Even if currently there are no other packages in the package collection, which share these library names, it is not nice to pollute the global namespace with versioned SONAME Provides. # repoquery --whatrequires libAggregation.so.1 freemedforms-devel-0:0.5.9-0.1.alpha1.fc16.i686 If we didn't had a base package dependency in the guidelines, this would break here already. [...] > Does it also mean that qt-creator and freemedforms should also be revised? freemedforms is mispackaged IMO: bug 742396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
