Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742543 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell <iarn...@gmail.com> 2011-10-02 23:09:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Yes. and I understand why. But rpmlint /doesn't/ complain about all the > > automatically detected unversioned provides (this package has ~70). The > > explicit provides are consistent with those automatically detected, and > > necessary since other packages may depend on them. Versioning them would be > > a > > lie since upstream hasn't given them explicit version (and where upstream > > has > > versioned specific packages, the version numbers bear no relation to the > > overall version of the distribution itself). > > Means, we should skip rpmlint's blurb here? The output is similar to the one > before: Yes. Upstream has deliberately hidden these modules which unfortunately, also hides them from rpm's automatic dependency generator. They need to be explicitly provided, but there is no version number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
