Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719150 Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> 2011-10-26 15:39:43 EDT --- PREREVIEW: Good: - group ok - License ok - rpmling ignorable/expected warnings $ rpmlint /home/tom/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/flocq-1.4.0-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm /home/tom/rpmbuild/SRPMS/flocq-1.4.0-1.fc15.src.rpm flocq.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti flocq.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US radix -> radii, radio, rad ix flocq.x86_64: E: no-binary flocq.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib flocq.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti flocq.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US radix -> radii, radio, rad ix flocq.src:30: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. - arch ok (needs to be in /usr/lib64 although noarch) - %files ok %{_libdir}/coq/user-contrib/ is owned by coq (a R) NEEDSWORK: - Please use INSTALL="install -p" for preserving timestamps Just a few questions, before I'll approve this: * Don't the source belongs to a devel package like other packages? (Don't know how that usually works in ocalm.) Or are the sources needed at runtime? * When the source are needed at runtime, this looks like a bug in the Makefile, so it should be installed automaticalls isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
